In today's strength and conditioning community, there seems to always be a debate, discussion, or even heated argument about something. This could be about technique, programming, periodization, or development theories. I am fully aware that this is not isolated to strength and conditioning, as this applies across sports coaches as well however, I have noticed that strength and conditioning researchers and coaches seem very set in their specific beliefs or methods. Though this may not be a bad thing, failure to grow or evolve in the face of new theories or research is a recipe for failure or stagnation. I am currently pursuing my Ed. D in kinesiology so I want to state that I fully support scientific processes, research, and application to strength and conditioning as well as human performance. Understanding scientific principles are essential to efficiently move weight and improve performance while reducing the risk of injury. ...